Search Results for "railways act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "railways act"

700 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 700 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation Claim in Railways Act Case, Overturning Tribunal's Denial Based on Self-Inflicted Injury Finding. Passenger's Fall from Train Door and Attempt to De-board Non-Halting Train Held Not to Constitute Intentional Self-Inflicted Injury Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989, as Incident Occurred Due to Rush and Bonafide Mistake.

24 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from the Railway Claims Tribunal's order dated 31 January 2018 rejecting the appellant's claim for compensation for injuries sustaine...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Despite Missing Ticket. Burden of Proof on Railways Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 to Show Negligence or Exception.

10 Oct 2022

The appellant, Sm. Mina w/o Punamchand Shahare, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, seeking compensation of Rs. 8,00,000/-...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Monitors Relief for Migrant Labourers During COVID-19 Lockdown — Directions Issued for Identification, Registration, and Transportation. Constitutional Duty of State to Protect Migrant Workers Under Article 21 Upheld.

5 Jun 2020

The Supreme Court of India, exercising its suo motu writ jurisdiction, took cognizance of the problems and miseries faced by migrant labourers during ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Brother of Deceased in Railway Accident Claim — Locus Standi of Legal Heir of Deceased Claimants Under Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the appellant, as legal heir of the deceased original claimants, is entitled to continue the claim and the definition of 'dependent' under Section 123(b) does not bar the claim.

6 Mar 2020

The appeal arose from a claim for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989, following the death of Samadhan Virbhan Bagul in a train accident on 24.0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Amputee Passenger in Railway Accident Case - Absence of Ticket and Alleged Intoxication Not Sufficient to Deny Compensation Under Railways Act, 1989. The court held that a person travelling in a train is presumed to be a bonafide passenger and the railway failed to prove the exception of intoxication under Section 124-A(d).

17 Feb 2020

The appellant, Ankush Ramaji Amzare, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a railway acciden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Parents of Deceased Passenger Entitled to Compensation. Tribunal Erred in Holding Deceased Not a Bona Fide Passenger Despite Production of Unused Tickets.

21 Jan 2020

The appellants, parents of the deceased Motiram Bramhadeo Haryan, filed a claim for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989 after their son died on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Death Due to Fall from Train, Holding It an 'Untoward Incident' Under Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the railway administration is strictly liable for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, even if the passenger's own negligence contributed to the incident.

6 Jul 2017

The appellant, Shankar Narayan Rathod (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Gangabai), filed an appeal against the dismissal of his compensat...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Claims Tribunal Award in Favour of Deceased Vendor's Family — Fall from Train Due to Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the railway administration failed to prove the exception of self-inflicted injury, and the death of a passenger selling articles in a train is an untoward incident attracting strict liability.

1 Jul 2017

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Railway Clai...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Railway Appeal in Goods Loss Case — Non-Declaration of Value Does Not Bar Compensation Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The court held that the railway administration, as a bailee, is liable for loss of goods even if the consignor did not declare their value, and the burden of proof to show reasonable care or exception lies on the railway.

13 Feb 2014

The respondent, M/s Satya Sai Exports, booked a consignment of shed antlers of Sambhar and Chital weighing 240 kilogrammes under Railway Receipt No. F...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Railway Accident Claims Cases — Appellants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 82A of the Railways Act, 1890 for Death of Minors in Untoward Incidents. The court held that the death of minors falling from trains constitutes an untoward incident under Section 82A of the Railways Act, 1890, and awarded Rs. 1,00,000 each to the appellants.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to three first appeals filed by the appellants against the Union of India, through the General Manager, Central Railway, Bombay,...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)