WRIT PETITION No. 4045 OF 2005
10 Dec 2013The matter arises from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, a local authority...
Search Results for "profit motive not essential"
155 result(s) found
Found 155 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners Under Right to Information Act, 2005 — Petitioner Alleges Vague Criteria and Lack of Judicial Expertise Violate Fundamental Rights. The Court Examines Whether Sections 12(5) and 15(5) Are Unconstitutional for Not Requiring Judicial Qualifications in Light of the Right to Information and Quasi-Judicial Functions.
1 Aug 2026The petitioner, a public-spirited citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution directly before the Supreme Court, challenging t...
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.
23 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...
- 693
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court's Rs. 50 Lakh Cost and CBI Probe in Habeas Corpus Case Involving Allegations of Illegal Detention and Political Mudslinging. High Court Had Found the Petition an Abuse of Process, Imposed Costs, and Directed CBI Investigation Against the Petitioner.
1 Aug 2026The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) dated 7 March 2011, dismissing a habeas corpus writ petiti...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Assault Case, Modifies Sentence Under IPC While Acquitting Under SC/ST Act. Caste-based slur allegations failed as incident occurred in private land dispute, not in public view under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
1 Jan 2026The appellant, Mani @ Subramaniyam, was convicted by the Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989,...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court examines legality of appointing persons with criminal background as Ministers. Interpretation of Articles 75 and 164 of the Constitution to uphold democratic integrity and combat criminalisation of politics.
1 Aug 2026The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed as a public interest litigation by the petitioner, Manoj Narula, challenging ...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.
7 Jan 2016The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...
- 11
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicts in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC. High Court's affirmation of life imprisonment upheld based on eyewitness testimony and discovery of weapons, despite challenges to evidence reliability.
29 Mar 2023The appeal arose from a murder conviction where two appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, a...
- 187
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights
8 Nov 2024The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...
- 2174
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Adoption by Hindu Widow with Majority Consent of Male Sapindas. Consent of a Female Sapinda, Even if Nearest in Degree, Not Required as She is Incompetent to Advise Due to Her Own Legal Incapacity under Hindu Law.
18 Sep 1969The appeal arose from a partition suit where the appellants, as successors-in-interest of one Kothandaraman, claimed a share in joint Hindu family pro...
- 16
