Search Results for "priority disposal"

310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Share Transfer Validity and Limitation. Rectification of Register of Members under Sections 59 and 88 of Companies Act, 2013 requires proof of valid share transfer and petition within limitation.

The case involves an appeal by Chalasani Udaya Shankar and others against M/s. Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and others, arising from a company petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Buyer in Scrap Sale Contract Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court Restrains Seller from Selling Scrap to Third Parties Pending Arbitration, Holding Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favor of Buyer.

The petitioner, Chetan Iron LLP, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures pending arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...