Search Results for "principal employer liability"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court has power to award interest for period between date of award and actual payment to prevent miscarriage of justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Labour Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Educational Society Against Labour Court Orders Granting Compensation to Workman. Employer's failure to prove abandonment of service and non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 leads to reinstatement with back wages.

The Karnataka Lingayat Education Society and its affiliated college, C.B. Kore Polytechnic, filed multiple writ petitions challenging orders of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Bank CEO Appointment Dispute — Upholds Apex Society's Power to Depute Cadre Officers. Section 54(3) of Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 obligates District Central Cooperative Bank to accept CEO deputed by State Cooperative Bank from its cadre.

The dispute arose from the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the first respondent, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, a District C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Accident on Public Road. Commissioner's finding of employer-employee relationship and negligence set aside as accident occurred outside course of employment under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Beed, awarding compensation to the respondents (claimants) for the deat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Order Allowing Workmen's Application for Payment of Gratuity and Other Dues from Company Assets. Workmen's dues have priority under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956, and Official Liquidator must pay from sale proceeds.

The case involves two appeals filed by Grand View Estates Private Limited and Forbes & Company Limited against an order of the Company Court allowing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen in Retrenchment Compensation Claim Against Electricity Company Under Industrial Disputes Act. Transfer of Undertaking to State Government Did Not Satisfy Section 25FF Proviso Conditions; Workmen Deemed Retrenched and Entitled to Compensation from Previous Employer.

The dispute arose out of the transfer of an electricity distribution undertaking owned by the South Arcot Electricity Distribution Company Limited to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revision of Wage Structure and Abolition of Concessions in Industrial Dispute. Employer Allowed to Abolish Bounty Concessions as Wage Structure Revision Principles Clarified.

This case arose from an industrial dispute between Messrs. Crown Aluminium Works and its workmen concerning the revision of wage structure and the abo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...