Search Results for "non obstante"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "non obstante"

1169 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1169 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Notices Against Axis Bank in Liquidation Proceeding — No Liability for Tax Deducted at Source Under MVAT Act After Company's Winding Up. The Court held that the State cannot recover tax from a secured creditor who had no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 42 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as the deduction obligation arises only when payment is made to the dealer, and after winding up, the Official Liquidator is the proper authority.

7 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Axis Bank Ltd., a banking company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court s...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Auction Purchaser in TNVAT Recovery Case — Priority of Crown Debt Over Mortgagee's Right. The court held that a bona fide auction purchaser who buys property through a mortgagee's sale under Section 69 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 takes the property free of all encumbrances, including subsequent tax demands under Section 24 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, D.K. Sadasivam, was the successful purchaser of a property (S.Nos. 7/10, 7/11 and 13/1 in Sigarahalli Village, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharm...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Holds Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Arbitrator's Order on Jurisdiction Under Section 16 and Order Appointing Arbitrator Under Section 11; Alternative Remedies U/S 34 and Article 136 Must Be Availed. The court found that an order under Section 11 is challengeable only before the Supreme Court under Article 136, and a Section 16 order can be contested after the award under Section 34, thus barring writ jurisdiction.

17 Oct 2023

This writ petition arose from a contractual dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), a government enterprise, and a joint ventu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Juvenile Cannot File Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC; Remedy Lies Under Juvenile Justice Act. The JJ Act is a complete code providing for bail provisions for children in conflict with law, and Section 438 CrPC is not available to them.

15 Jul 2022

The case involved a reference to a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court to decide whether a juvenile in conflict with law can file an application f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.

17 Dec 2020

The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Under Article 227 Against Revisional Order Upholding Eviction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Licensee Company Challenges Jurisdiction, Arguing Non-Applicability of Act Due to Paid-Up Capital Exceeding Rs. 1 Crore Under Section 3(1)(b).

5 Jul 2023

Background: The matter involves a dispute between licensors (owners of a flat in Galaxy Apartments, Bandra) and a licensee company (petitioner no. 1) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Remands Overtime Allowance Claim to Central Administrative Tribunal for Fresh Determination in Light of Legislative Change. The Court held that the Tribunal must reconsider the claim under Section 59 of the Factories Act, 1948, after considering the Factories (Amendment) Act, 1987.

31 Jan 2006

The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, and others, filed a writ petition challenging the judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Unregistered Agreement Under MOFA — Loan Defence Rejected. Agreement for sale under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 is enforceable despite non-registration.

26 Nov 2012

The plaintiffs, shop purchasers, filed a suit for specific performance of an unregistered agreement for sale dated 31.8.1991 against the defendant dev...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)