Search Results for "medical practitioner"

689 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 689 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Council of Architecture's Appeal, Upholds That Section 37 of Architects Act Only Prohibits Use of Title 'Architect'. Government Posts Titled 'Architect' Can Be Held by Unregistered Individuals as the Act Does Not Prohibit Practice of Architecture.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment that Section 37 of the Architects Act, 1972 only prohibits unregister...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Writ Petition Against Insurance Ombudsman Award in Life Insurance Claim. Non-Disclosure of Pre-Existing Ailments Not Proven to be Material Under Section 45 of Insurance Act, 1938.

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged an award dated 31 December 2020 passed by the Insurance Ombudsman, Goa/Mumbai Met...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Doctor in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent and Unreliable Testimony of Prosecutrix. Allegations of Rape and Outraging Modesty Fail as Medical Evidence and Conduct of Prosecutrix Contradict Her Claims Under Sections 376, 354, 509, 506 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Arvind Kashinath Bondekar, a medical practitioner, for offences under Sections 376, 354, 50...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Workman in Tractor Accident Case — Loss of Earning Capacity Reassessed at 100% Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923. Amputation of leg and fracture rendered driver permanently totally disabled, warranting full compensation.

The appellant, Shrishail Mallappa Ganiger, was employed as a driver of a tractor owned by respondent No.1, Girish Subhash Dhavaleshwar, and insured wi...