Search Results for "manufacturing facility"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "manufacturing facility"

251 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 251 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

20 Jul 2016

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay hears writ petition challenging constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 on input tax credit set-off — Petitioner seeks reading down of 'actually paid' to 'ought to have been paid'

11 May 2012

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a partnership firm registered as a dealer under the Maharashtra Value Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Prior Government Supply of Paper. The condition requiring bidders to have supplied 70 GSM writing and printing paper to any government department in the preceding three years was held to be a valid technical qualification and not arbitrary under Article 14 of the Constitution.

15 Jun 2021

The case involves a group of writ petitions filed by paper manufacturing companies challenging tender conditions issued by the Maharashtra State Burea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Jurisdictional Clash Between Forward Markets Commission and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Over Electricity Futures Trading. The Court Considered Whether the Electricity Act, 2003 Overrides the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, and Whether the Power Market Regulations 2010 Framed by CERC Were Ultra Vires.

7 Feb 2011

The matter involved two writ petitions being heard together by the Bombay High Court, arising from a jurisdictional conflict between two regulatory bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Injunction Dispute Over Land Access. High Court sets aside lower courts' orders rejecting temporary injunction, finding that the Plaintiff had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience for restraining Defendants from interfering with its right of way.

23 Jun 2026

The Petitioner, Mondelez India Foods Private Limited (formerly Cadbury India Company Ltd), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'Aerotide' vs 'Ferotide' Found Deceptively Similar. Phonetic and structural similarity between marks for pharmaceutical products justified interim restraint under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

19 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., challenged an interim injunction order dated 05.03.2010 passed by the District Judge-3, Ahmednagar,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds ESI Coverage for BCCI as 'Shop' Under ESI Act — Sports Body Engages in Systematic Commercial Activity. BCCI held to be a 'shop' under notification dated 18th September 1978 issued under Section 1(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, as it carries out systematic commercial activities including sale of tickets, broadcasting rights, and merchandise.

24 Jun 2022

The present appeal was filed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) against the judgment and order dated 9th September 2021 passed by the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge by CFS Operators to Customs Public Notices. Petition Under Article 226 Seeks Quashing of Notices Allegedly Imposing Unlawful Restrictions on Container Freight Stations.

5 Jun 2017

The petitioners, comprising thirteen Container Freight Station (CFS) operators and thirteen individual directors, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Shareholder's Allegations of Fraud Do Not Override Statutory Bar When Secured Assets Are Involved.

15 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Shashikant Gangar, a shareholder and director of Libox Chem (India) Private Limited (respondent no. 2), filed a writ petition challeng...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)