Search Results for "male victim"

466 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 466 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals in Gang Rape of Minor Under IPC and POCSO Act. Trial Court Convicted Two Accused and Imposed Death Penalty, Requiring High Court Review.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a death sentence confirmation reference and two criminal appeals arising from Special (POC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Brutal Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Testimony Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 363, 376, 377 IPC.

The case involves the brutal kidnapping, rape, unnatural offence, and murder of a two-year-old girl by the appellant, Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare, in Jalna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Accused's Failure to Explain Incriminating Circumstances Led to Confirmation of Life Imprisonment Under Sections 302 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Chandrabhan @ Aba Jagan Salunke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 363, 376, 302, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Accused in Rape and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 376 IPC sustained as witness testimonies were trustworthy and chain of circumstances was complete, applying last seen theory and Section 106 Evidence Act.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal by an accused convicted under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the rape and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Taking or Enticing Minor. Prosecution Fails to Prove Essential Ingredients of Section 363 IPC as Minor Victim's Testimony Does Not Establish That She Was Taken Away by Accused.

The appellants, Sau. Banu Ramchandra Borgaonkar and Sandip Kedar Pande, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping in POCSO Case — Acquittal on Sexual Offences Stands. Appellant convicted under Section 363 IPC for taking a minor without consent, but acquitted of rape and sexual assault due to lack of credible evidence.

The appellant, Issub Khan, was convicted by the Fast Track Court (POCSO) at Panaji for the offence of kidnapping under Section 363 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

43994

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Madras High Court dated 06.10.2007, which upheld convictions and senten...