ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010
8 Jan 2016The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...
Search Results for "make available"
14722 result(s) found
Found 14722 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.
1 Jan 1970These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...
- 84
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in TADA Case — Confessional Statements Held Inadmissible Due to Procedural Violations. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Kidnapping and Murder of Vice-Chancellor Under Sections 302, 368, 365 RPC and Sections 3, 4 TADA Act.
20 Mar 2025The case arises from the kidnapping and murder of Dr. Mushir-ul-Haq, Vice-Chancellor of Kashmir University, and his Personal Secretary Abdul Gani Zarg...
- 736
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.
13 Mar 2023The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...
- 80
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Sub-Classification Within Scheduled Castes for Reservation in Punjab Act. State can provide preferential treatment to more backward castes without tinkering with Presidential List under Article 341.
27 Aug 2020The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) ...
- 389
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act, 1981 Citing Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Flaws. Detention Based on Stale Past Incidents and Improper Communication of Right to Representation Raises Concerns Under Article 22(5).
26 Mar 2019The petitioner, a resident of Aurangabad, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive det...
- 62
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation on Road Safety, Emphasizing Mandatory Duties of Municipal Corporations. Expansive Definition of 'Public Street' and Obligation to Ensure Safe Passage Under Sections 61(m), (n), (o) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Reaffirmed.
12 Apr 2018This judgment in suo motu Public Interest Litigation No. 71 of 2013 arose from the Bombay High Court's concern about the deplorable condition of roads...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Interim Application by Writers of Original Film Against Remake Film Producers Alleging Copyright Infringement of Literary Works. Writers Claim Exclusive Copyright in Story, Screenplay and Dialogues of 1973 Film 'Zanjeer' and Seek Injunction Against Unauthorized Remake in Hindi and Telugu Under Sections 18 and 19 of Copyright Act, 1957.
2 Sep 2013The matter arises from a copyright dispute over the iconic Hindi film 'Zanjeer' (1973). Plaintiffs Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar, acclaimed writers, cla...
- 56
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Quashing of Tax Assessment in Inter-State Gas Sale Dispute. State Imposed Tax on Sale of Natural Gas Extracted Under Production Sharing Contract, High Court Quashed Assessment and Directed Refund.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court of India heard a group of civil appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, Luckno...
- 75
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.
11 Nov 2021The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...
- 230
