Search Results for "licence termination"

398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination Clause in Employment Contract. Clause 12(c)(ii) allowing termination without cause held not unconscionable or contrary to public policy under Section 23 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The petitioner, Ms. Jayshree Gururaj, was appointed as Senior Director (Advanced Services) in Cisco Systems (India) Private Limited on 15 May 2012. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Full Back-Wages for Illegal Termination of Workman. Employer's Denial of Employment Relationship Rejected Based on Documentary Evidence and Conduct.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Tekchand Khanchandani, proprietor of Vikas Garments, challenging a Labour Court award dated 8 June 2006. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in LPG Dealership Dispute — Termination Upheld as Valid. Arbitrator's findings on breach of agreement clauses and quantification of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Ms. Anila Gautam Jain, proprietress of M/s. Badal Agency, was appointed as a dealer by the Respondent, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...