Search Results for "judicial economy"

466 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 466 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition for Regularization of Services of Gram Panchayat Employee; Examines Applicability of Umadevi (2006) 4 SCC 1 to Long-Serving Gram Panchayat Employees.

The petitioner, a retired Gram Panchayat employee, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Conductor in MSRTC Misappropriation Case. Labour Court's refusal to interfere with punishment of dismissal for collecting Rs.14/- but issuing Rs.5/- ticket and having cash excess of Rs.11/- is confirmed as not perverse.

The petitioner, Rohidas Premchand Bhagat, was employed as a bus conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 1 Novemb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Mandatory 75% Voting Share for Resolution Plan Approval Under I&B Code. Financial Creditors' Rejection of Resolution Plan for Kamineni Steel & Power India Pvt. Ltd. and Innoventive Industries Ltd. Leads to Liquidation as Plan Did Not Garner Required Majority.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals arising from a common judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 6 September 2018,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Award Holder Against Award Debtor. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Non-Compliance, Incapacity, Natural Justice, and Public Policy.

The case concerns the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 17th January, 2011 passed in London, UK, in favor of Vitol S.A. (the award holder)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...