Search Results for "destroying evidence"

199 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 199 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating and Extortion Case Due to Civil Dispute and Delayed Filing. Court holds that criminal proceedings cannot be used as a tool for recovery of money in a consensual relationship.

The applicant, Ujwala Prakash Sahare, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reverses Lower Appellate Court's Erroneous Reversal of Trial Court's Decree. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Reappreciate Evidence Independently and That a Co-Owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Without Ouster.

The present second appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) against the appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Fire Policy Coverage for Damaged Machinery Upheld. Surveyor's Report Not Binding on Insured; Insurer Cannot Repudiate Claim Based on Surveyor's Assessment Without Independent Grounds.

The appellant, M/s Super Label Mfg. Co., a registered partnership firm engaged in printing high technology labels, imported sophisticated printing mac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Police Act Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Order under Section 55 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 set aside as authority did not consider whether proceedings under Section 107 of CrPC would suffice.

The petitioner, a resident of Kunigal Taluk, challenged an externment order dated 15-12-2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner and Sub Divisional M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SDO Order Remanding Sawmill Fine Case for Fresh Panchnama. Tahsildar's fine for illegal timber possession set aside due to lack of proper enquiry and violation of natural justice.

The petitioner, Vasant Govind Rajguru, a sawmill owner in Jamkhed, Ahmednagar, challenged the order dated 05.01.2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...