Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Sukhdevsing Sajjusing Sohel, was preventively detained by an order dated 04/12/2025 passed by the Police Commissioner, Vadodara, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Evidence Linking Detenu to Offences. Detenu's Name Not in FIRs and In-camera Statements Not Verified by Competent Authority.

The petitioner, Santosh Subhash Koli, through his mother Sunandabai Subhash Koli, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance — Single Criminal Case and In-camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Detention as 'Dangerous Person'

The petitioner, Arjun Balkrishna Sonavane, challenged a preventive detention order dated 12.10.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was on bail and conditions ensured no prejudicial activity.

The petitioner, Intezar Umar Daraj Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 31st October 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Discharge Under MCOC Act — Prima Facie Material Found Sufficient for Trial. The Court held that the Special Judge erred in allowing transfer under Section 11 MCOC Act without considering the prima facie material indicating organized crime.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 2nd September 2002 passed by the learned Special Judge, MCOC Act, Nashik in MCO...