Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

793 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 793 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Foreign Company in Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Foreign Award Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Challenge to Foreign Award Lies Only Under Sections 47-48 for Enforcement, Overruling Bombay High Court's Reliance on Bhatia International.

The appellant, Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA (now Noy Ambiente S.p.a), an Italian company, challenged a judgment of the Bombay High Court which held t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Water Treatment Plant Contract Dispute. Arbitration Proceedings Conducted Under ICC Rules Were Valid Despite Corporation's Objection to Applicability of Rules.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 24 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010

The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that arbitrators are not bound to give reasons for each item of claim and that the award is not liable to be set aside for non-speaking nature under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

The appellant, Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a contract dated 12/10/1985...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Award Was Not in Conflict with Public Policy and Did Not Suffer from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Hi Style India Pvt. Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Fraud Dispute. Serious Allegations of Misappropriation Render Dispute Non-Arbitrable Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Applicant, Ivory Properties & Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Substitution of Arbitrator in CPWD Contract Dispute, Holding Retired Departmental Officers Ineligible Under Amended Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Former Judge as Sole Arbitrator to Resolve Multiple Contractual Disputes Arising from Six Construction Agreements.

The dispute arose from six separate construction contracts awarded by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) to M/s Sri Krishna Shelters Pvt. Ltd....