RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023
30 Jan 2026The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...
Search Results for "Tribunal error"
4629 result(s) found
Found 4629 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside.
6 Apr 2026The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th Sep...
- 178
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Apportionment of Liability Between Tortfeasors Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held both drivers jointly and severally liable as joint tortfeasors and enhanced compensation by considering future prospects and increasing interest rate.
25 Mar 2026The present appeal was filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the original claimants, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the j...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces Verdict in Arbitration Petition Challenging Award That Set Aside Termination of Oil Terminal Operations Contract. Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Alleges Award is Patently Illegal as Arbitrator Disregarded Contract Terms and Misinterpreted Safety Audit Report.
19 Dec 2025The dispute arose from an Operating and Services Agreement (OSA) dated 5 May 2015 between HPCL and Aegis for management, operation and maintenance of ...
- 13
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Tribunal Matter — Upholds Single Judge's Order Confirming Occupancy Rights. Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights to Respondent No.3 Under Section 48-A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 Upheld as Based on Proper Evidence and Not Vitiated by Fraud.
6 Mar 2017The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by the legal representatives of the original appellant, Hasansab Allasaheb Pendari, against the order of the ...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.
4 May 2018These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Appeal Dismissed for Non-Prosecution by ITAT — Rule 24 of ITAT Rules Does Not Confer Power to Dismiss Appeal for Default in Absence of Notice of Hearing. The Court Held That the Tribunal Must Hear the Appellant Before Dismissing the Appeal and Has Inherent Power to Restore It.
23 Oct 2013The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated ...
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses SEBI's Appeal in Securities Market Violation Case Due to Absence of Question of Law. Tribunal's Factual Findings on Advertisements, Manipulation, and Natural Justice Upheld, with Jurisdiction Under Section 15Z of SEBI Act, 1992 Confined to Legal Issues.
25 Mar 2022The dispute arose from a statutory appeal under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, filed by SEBI against the Securit...
- 361
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order Refusing Recall of CIRP Admission Order. Recall Application Under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016 Not Maintainable as It Seeks Review of Merits, Not Correction of Clerical Error or Fraud.
1 Jan 2025The appellant, RCC E-Construct Pvt. Ltd., filed a Company Appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai, challenging the ...
- 230
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal of Minor Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Negligence Apportionment Set Aside, Compensation Enhanced. The court held that a pillion rider cannot be attributed contributory negligence and enhanced compensation from Rs. 2,52,000 to Rs. 4,00,000 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
25 Mar 2026The present appeal was filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the original claimant, a minor represented through his natural guar...
- 132
