Search Results for "Suo Moto order"

648 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 648 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Applications for Deletion of Defendants. The Court Examines Whether Directors and Former Employees Are Necessary Parties in a Suit for Breach of Contract Under Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The matter concerns a writ petition filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2025

The appellant, a partnership firm, filed a commercial suit for recovery of its claim amount after attempting pre-institution mediation. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Competing Kerosene Dealer for Lack of Locus Standi. Mere Competitor Not a Person Aggrieved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The appellant, Rajendra Agrawal, a semi-wholesale kerosene dealer in Murtizapur, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a Single Judge dis...