Search Results for "SLAO"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied Due to Lack of Evidence. Claimants Failed to Produce Comparable Sales Evidence Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference Remand Due to Communication Gap Between Claimants and Counsel. Petitioners denied opportunity to lead evidence in LAR proceedings under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, warranting remand for fresh adjudication.

The petitioners, original claimants in a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenged the judgment and or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Condoning Delay Due to Lack of Knowledge. Delay in Filing Application for Enhanced Compensation Condoned as Petitioner Had No Knowledge of Reference Court Judgment and Acted Promptly.

The petitioner, Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale, owned land in Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9 at village Sakol, Taluka Shirur Anantpal, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Compensation Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for Land Acquired in 1979. Non-Payment of Compensation and Lack of Notice Constitute Continuing Wrong, Entitling Petitioner to Compensation Under the 2013 Act.

The petitioner, Nandkumar s/o Tukaram Janrao, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for his agricultural land admeasuring 12 R from Gut No. 104 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award Due to Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years from Section 6 Declaration Renders Acquisition Proceedings Void.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Maruti Genba Veer and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Petitioner's land reserved as 'Mela Ground' in Development Plan of 2004 not acquired within statutory period, resulting in deemed lapsing of reservation.

The petitioner, Sunil Mallikarjun Patil, is the owner of land bearing survey no. 40/1/B, out of which 0.52 hectares from survey no. 40 (Part), Shelgi,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Caste Validity Cancellation by Scrutiny Committee. Petitioners failed to prove tribal origin and continuous residence in scheduled area, leading to cancellation of caste certificates.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by 70 individuals challenging the orders of the Caste Scrutiny Committee, which cancelled their cast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case, Restores Reference Court's Compensation with 10% Development Deduction for Hiwra Dam Project. The Court held that for irrigation projects, development deduction should be minimal and unrebutted expert valuation evidence must be considered.

The appeals arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Hiwra Dam project in Maharashtra. The appellant and respondents No.2 and 3 owned a partner...