Search Results for "Rule 4(20)"

1241 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1241 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash FIR Against Bookies for Offences Under Karnataka Police Act and IPC. Allegations Pertain to Unauthorized Collection of Betting Amounts and Tax Evasion Within Bangalore Turf Club Premises.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by twenty-six individuals or entities (th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Police to Conduct Fair Investigation in Crime No.193/2022 in Accordance with Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and RBI/NPCI Guidelines — Petitioner PhonePe Private Limited seeks mandamus for comprehensive probe.

The petitioner, PhonePe Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 and a Third Party Application Provider (TPAP) in the UPI e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servant in Section 409 IPC Case for Want of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. The Court Held That the Petitioner's Acts of Collecting Fares and Issuing Tickets Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory.

The petitioner, Shri Babruwan Kinalkar, was a driver employed by the Kadamba Transport Corporation Limited (respondent no.2), a State Transport Undert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Section 409 IPC Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sanction. Petitioner discharged as trial was pending for over 12 years without commencement, violating right to speedy trial under Article 21 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Babruwan Kinalkar, a former conductor of Kadamba Transport Corporation Limited, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge Sheet in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegation of Cheating and Dishonour of Cheque Under Sections 138, 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Sections 406, 420 IPC Fails as Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature.

The petitioners, original accused nos. 1 to 3, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of the FIR and charg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Hospital Partners in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Dispute over partnership and hospital management held to be purely civil, not criminal, under Sections 420, 409, 504, 506, 120-B IPC.

The applicants, partners of Venus Critical Care Hospital, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Property Dispute — Civil Nature of Dispute Precludes Criminal Liability. Agreement for Development and Sale of Flats Breached; Court Holds That Mere Breach of Contract Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The petitioner, Babu Dadasaheb Gavhane, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Quashing Petition in Dowry and Cheating Case, Exonerates Married Sister and Marriage Bureau Owner. FIR Quashed for Accused Nos. 4 and 5 as No Specific Role Attributed in Offences under Sections 420, 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who were original accused in a dowry harassment and cheating case, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Pensioners in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. The court held that the dispute was purely civil and no criminal intent was made out under Sections 403, 406, 420 IPC.

The petitioners, Syed Salavuddin and Sudhakar, were accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.C.No.463/2013 pending before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC at Humna...