Search Results for "Representation disposal"

2127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment of Government Poramboke Land. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Ravichandran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation Against Illegal Quarrying — Mandamus Issued for Disposal Within Three Months. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Senthilkumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Mandamus to direct respondents 2 to 6 (th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Road Widening in Public Interest. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation Within Three Months Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, C. Esakkimuthu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition in Part and Issues Mandamus to Deputy Commissioner to Consider Representation Against Petrol Bunk. Representation Regarding Illegal Fuel Station Establishment Must Be Decided Within Four Weeks, Failing Which Officer to Pay Rs.2000 Per Day.

The petitioner, S K Chandrashekar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the non-consideration o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Main Offence Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The petitioner, father of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order dated 13th November 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Railway...