Search Results for "POCSO Act, 2012"

549 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 549 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Recall of Victim for Cross-Examination in POCSO Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Delay. The court held that the accused's right to fair trial includes effective cross-examination, and the trial court's rejection of the recall application was not justified.

The petitioner, Chandrakant @ Kantu, was accused in Special Case (POCSO) No.11/2018 for offences under Sections 366(A) and 376(2)(i)(n) of IPC and Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5(j)(ii) and (l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(j)(n) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Riyaz @ Riyaz Pasha, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Special Case No.80/2014 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Allegation Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses Under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Sundaram, was convicted by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri, for offences under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove penetrative sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kishor Shankar Palve, was convicted by the Special Court and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 3 punish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal Against Conviction for Acid Attack and Stalking — Conviction Under POCSO Act Set Aside as Victim Was Not a Child. Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 326-A, 354-D, 506 IPC Based on Credible Victim Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Abuzar Ayyaz Tamboli, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 326-A, 354-D, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 10 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on a Deaf, Dumb, and Bedridden Minor Child under POCSO Act and IPC. Mother's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offence of Rape and House Trespass.

The case involves the conviction of Mukesh son of Tulshiram Madavi for offences under Section 454 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 6 read wi...