Search Results for "Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994"

268 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 268 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against State's Denial of Permission to Open New Faculties in Existing Unaided College. State's refusal based on policy not applicable to unaided colleges violates Article 19(1)(g) and 14 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Namita Education and Welfare Society, runs Siddharth College of Arts at Boradpada, Post-Chargaon, Tal-Ambernath, District-Thane, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Chancellor's Refusal to Intervene in University Appointment. Chancellor's Power Under Section 76(7) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 is Administrative, Not Quasi-Judicial, Hence Writ Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Mrs. Vandana Khedikar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order/communication dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Educational Institution Challenging University Grievance Committee Decision. Management Directed to Pay Arrears to Lecturer Under Section 57(2) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The petitioners, Yeshwant Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and its B.Ed. College, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging State Government's Interference in University Admissions for B.Ed. Course. State Government Cannot Prescribe Admission Rules Overriding University Autonomy and NCTE Guidelines.

The petitioners, K.S. Thara and H.S. Manjunath, were graduates who sought admission to the B.Ed. course in Bharathi College of Education and Vatsalya ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 64 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Barring Legal Practitioners from Appearing Before College Tribunal. Section 64 is Not Repugnant to Advocates Act, 1961 as Section 30 Thereof is Not in Force and Tribunal is Not a Court.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging Section 64 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, which bars legal practitioners from appeari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition in Service Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Direction for Fresh Enquiry from Stage of Cross-Examination. Denial of Cross-Examination Violates Natural Justice Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Secretary and Principal of Pratibha Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (the management) against the order of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging University's Refusal to Appoint PhD Holders as Lecturers in Pali and Buddhism. UGC Regulations Exempt PhD Holders from NET/SET Requirement, University's Contrary Stance Held Arbitrary.

The petitioners, five PhD holders in Pali and Buddhism, applied for the post of Lecturer in Pali and Buddhism at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada Uni...