Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against State's Denial of Permission to Open New Faculties in Existing Unaided College. State's refusal based on policy not applicable to unaided colleges violates Article 19(1)(g) and 14 of Constitution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 80
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Namita Education and Welfare Society, runs Siddharth College of Arts at Boradpada, Post-Chargaon, Tal-Ambernath, District-Thane, which is an unaided college already granted permission for B.Ed and B.Com faculties. In response to an advertisement dated 9th December 2015 by the University of Mumbai inviting proposals under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 for the academic year 2016-17, the petitioner applied for opening new B.Sc and B.A. faculties. The Local Enquiry Committee submitted a favorable inspection report, and the University granted affiliation for these faculties. However, the State Government, by letter dated 23rd September 2016, declined permission to open the new faculties, citing a policy decision that no new colleges or faculties would be permitted in certain areas. The petitioner challenged this refusal by way of a writ petition. The court noted that the State's policy was applicable only to aided colleges and not to unaided colleges like the petitioner's. The court held that the refusal was arbitrary and violative of Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The court quashed the State's letter and directed the State to grant permission for the new faculties within four weeks, subject to the petitioner complying with all other requirements.

Headnote

A) Constitution Law - Right to Establish Educational Institution - Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 - The State's refusal to grant permission to open new faculties in an existing unaided college based on a policy that applies only to aided colleges is arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights. The court held that the policy cannot be applied to unaided colleges and the refusal was unsustainable. (Paras 1-9)

B) Education Law - Affiliation - Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - The University of Mumbai had granted affiliation for B.Sc. and B.A. faculties, but the State refused permission citing a policy. The court held that once the University grants affiliation, the State cannot refuse permission on grounds not applicable to unaided colleges. (Paras 2-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government can refuse permission to open new faculties in an existing unaided college based on a policy that is not applicable to unaided colleges?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the State's letter dated 23rd September 2016, and directed the State to grant permission for the new faculties within four weeks, subject to compliance with all other requirements.

Law Points

  • Right to establish and administer educational institution
  • Article 19(1)(g) Constitution of India
  • Article 14 Constitution of India
  • Policy not applicable to unaided colleges
  • Maharashtra Universities Act 1994
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (11) 208

WRIT PETITION NO. 1959 OF 2017

2017-11-07

B.R. Gavai, Sandeep K. Shinde

2017:BHC-OS:13710-DB

Mr. B.P. Pandey a/w. Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar i/by. Mr. Vikas B. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Takke, Asst. Government Pleader for the State, respondent no.1. Mr. Rui A. Rodrigues, Advocate for respondent no.2.

Namita Education and Welfare Society

State of Maharashtra, University of Mumbai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the State Government's refusal to grant permission to open new faculties in an existing unaided college.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the State's letter dated 23rd September 2016 and direction to grant permission for B.Sc and B.A. faculties.

Filing Reason

State declined permission to open new faculties despite University granting affiliation, citing a policy not applicable to unaided colleges.

Previous Decisions

University of Mumbai granted affiliation for B.Sc and B.A. faculties; State refused permission on 23rd September 2016.

Issues

Whether the State Government can refuse permission to open new faculties in an existing unaided college based on a policy that is not applicable to unaided colleges?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the State's policy was applicable only to aided colleges and not to unaided colleges, and the refusal was arbitrary. State argued that the policy decision was taken in public interest and applied uniformly.

Ratio Decidendi

The State's policy restricting opening of new colleges/faculties applies only to aided colleges and cannot be applied to unaided colleges. Refusing permission to an unaided college based on such policy violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of the Constitution.

Judgment Excerpts

The State, in its Higher and Technical Education Department declined the permission to the petitioner Institute, for opening new faculty in Bachelor of Arts and Science in their existing College on 23rd September, 2016 and thus this petition. The policy decision of the State Government is applicable only to the aided colleges and not to the unaided colleges. In that view of the matter, the impugned order dated 23rd September, 2016 is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

Petitioner applied for new faculties in response to University advertisement dated 9th December 2015. Local Enquiry Committee submitted favorable report. University granted affiliation. State refused permission on 23rd September 2016. Petitioner filed writ petition on 7th November 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 19(1)(g), Article 14
  • Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Claimants. Principle of parity applied as earlier group of appeals from same acquisition proceedings had already upheld enhanced compe...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Election Petition in Representation of the People Act Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction to Challenge Electoral Roll Entry. Entry in Electoral Roll Based on Ordinary Residence Cannot Be Questioned in Election Petition...