PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003
21 Nov 2006The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...
Search Results for "MRTP Act reservation"
301 result(s) found
Found 301 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.
5 Aug 2016The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Development of Land Reserved for Garden in Development Plan. Reservation of land for public purpose does not automatically lapse upon non-development within plan period; landowner must be given opportunity to develop or be compensated under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.
10 Oct 2023The petitioners, Runwal Township Pvt. Ltd. and its director Kishorkumar Jain, owned land in Mumbai that was reserved for a garden in the Development P...
- 45
High Court
High Court Dismisses Public Interest Litigation Challenging Allotment of Plots to Cooperative Housing Societies of Judges; Finds Delay and No Illegality. Allotment at Ready Reckoner Rate and Change of Reservation Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Held Valid; No Favouritism Shown to Judges.
22 Nov 2012This Public Interest Litigation, filed on 3 March 2011, challenged the allotment of government land to two cooperative housing societies whose members...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Gairan Land for PMAY Housing Due to Violation of Section 22A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Collector's Order Set Aside for Failure to Establish Non-Availability of Alternative Land Before Diverting Common Pasture Land.
12 Sep 2024The petitioners, Santosh Madhukar Bhondve and others, filed a writ petition challenging the allotment of 1H 46R of land in Gut No.96, situated at Mauj...
- 832
High Court
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Pimpri-Chinchwad New Town Development Authority — Compensation Enhancement Granted. Landowners entitled to higher compensation under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquisitions under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
7 Aug 2019The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by landowners and a developer challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Pimpri-Chinch...
- 307
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.
8 May 2023The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...
- 213
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 89 of MRTP Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Prior Civil Court Decree Declaring Petitioner as Lessee and Not Trespasser Bars Corporation from Issuing Notice Under Different Act
19 Apr 2012The petitioner, M/s. Iqbal & Brothers, a partnership firm, challenged a notice dated 2nd December 1997 issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation under ...
- 162
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Amenity Space Computation Dispute — D.P. Road Area Must Be Adjusted Against Total Amenity Space Under DCR 57(4)(c)(ii). The court held that the Municipal Corporation's refusal to sanction plans based on a misinterpretation of DCR 57(4)(c)(ii) and Note II was arbitrary and unsustainable.
5 Sep 2023The petitioner, Atul Projects India Pvt Ltd, a developer, owned a plot of land in Mumbai and submitted development plans to the Municipal Corporation ...
- 151
