Search Results for "Finance Act 1978"

406 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 406 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor's Suit for Specific Performance and Allows Society's Counterclaim for Damages in Construction Dispute. Agreement dated 13th March 1978 held valid but not specifically enforceable due to mutual breaches and failure to prove readiness and willingness.

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between M/s. Shanti Builders (a building contractor) and CIBA Industrial Workers' Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. (t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Enforcement of Sixth Pay Commission Pay Scales for Teachers in Unaided Minority School Based on Recognition Terms. Writ Petition Filed Under Article 226 Challenges Non-Payment of Salary as per Government Resolution Dated 21 May 2010.

Background: The dispute involved twenty-three teachers employed by an unaided private minority school (Saint Joseph's English School, Buldhana, manage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Registration Cancellation Without Notice. Cancellation of registration under Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017 set aside for violation of principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued before cancellation.

The petitioner, Dee Vee Projects Ltd., a public limited company engaged in infrastructure development, was registered under the erstwhile State Sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...