Search Results for "District Sports Council"

148 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses PILs and Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Court Holds That UGC Regulations 2010 Not Adopted by University, and Search Committee and Chancellor’s Decision Not Vitiated by Illegality or Mala Fides.

The litigation arose out of three petitions—two public interest litigations and one writ petition—challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land — Held That No Notice Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Is Required for Unauthorized Occupants and That Encroachment on Public Land Cannot Be Regularized.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by different groups of petitioners challenging the demolition of their constructions on land belonging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Examines Constitutional Validity of Governmental Appeal Provision in Municipal Matters. Section 184D of Goa Municipalities Act, 1968, Providing Appeal to Government from Appellate Tribunal, Challenged as Unconstitutional.

This batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 184D of the G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Vice-Chancellor Appointment Under UGC Regulations and Maharashtra Universities Act. Challenge Focuses on Applicability of UGC Regulations 2010 and Discretion of Chancellor in Selecting Vice-Chancellor.

The petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Online Booking Convenience Fees. The Court considered whether service charges exceeding Rs.10 per ticket form part of 'payment for admission' under Section 2(b) of Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, 1923.

The writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an amendment to the Maharashtra ...