Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"

3133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3133 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.

1 Dec 2016

The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Arbitral Award in Slum Redevelopment Agreement Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Setting Aside of Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Sep 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases, Upholding Enhanced Compensation for Claimants. The court held that the Reference Court's reliance on sale instances and potential value of land for non-agricultural use was justified, and no deduction for development charges was warranted.

27 Apr 2020

The case involves four first appeals filed by the Executive Engineer, Beed Irrigation Division, through Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Cor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Rectification Deed Held Invalid for Reducing Consideration Without Commercial Substance. The Court restored the addition of Rs. 10,69,79,146/- made by the Assessing Officer under the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the rectification deed was a colourable device to evade tax.

22 Mar 2022

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which dismissed its appeal and confirmed the order of the Inc...

High Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under 2013 Act. Compensation Must Be Determined as per Market Value Under Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Without Applying Theory of Dediction from Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as per Section 26 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

27 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land for widening and four-laning of National Highway No.12-A in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, under The Right t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses HPCL's Challenge to Residential Complex Near Refinery; Upholds Permissions and Finds No Merit in Challenge to D.C. Regulations

12 Apr 2012

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a Government of India enterprise operating...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs MHADA to Pay Compensation for Land Acquired 36 Years Ago Without Award — Violation of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution. Non-payment of compensation for compulsory acquisition under Section 93(5) of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, held arbitrary and unconstitutional; court orders payment with interest at 9% per annum from date of possession.

1 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Yusuf Yunus Kantharia, was the owner of a plot of land measuring 979 sq. metres in Dharavi, Mumbai, along with a chawl known as Kantha...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)