Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

542 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 542 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show-Cause Notice Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — DGGI Officer Not Authorized as Proper Officer. The court held that only officers specifically authorized by the Commissioner can issue notices under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the DGGI officer lacked such authorization.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s NCS Pearson Inc., a Minnesota-based corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Customs Duty After Inordinate Delay. Demand notice under Section 72(1) of Customs Act, 1962 cannot be enforced after five years of inaction by customs authorities.

13 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Anu Products Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, aggrieved by a recovery i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — CESTAT's Finding of Baseless Charges Upheld. Penalty Dropped as Evidence Lacked Direct Link to Respondent Under Customs Act, 1962.

15 Dec 2022

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals on Interest on Refund Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Interest Payable from Expiry of Three Months from Date of Initial Refund Claim, Not from Date of Tribunal Order. The court followed the Supreme Court decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. UoI, holding that the date of initial refund claim is the relevant date for computing interest under Section 11BB.

2 Dec 2022

The appellant, Lavino Kapur Cotton Pvt. Ltd., filed four refund applications under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for refund of duty amounti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Transitional Input Tax Credit Under GST — Time Limit for Filing TRAN-1 Form Held Directory, Not Mandatory. The court directed the GST authorities to accept the TRAN-1 Form filed beyond the prescribed time limit, holding that the time limit was directory and the petitioner had sufficient cause for delay.

20 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Nelco Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, supplies and undertakes various network-related services. It file...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute. Customs duty under Section 150(2)(c) of Customs Act, 1962 has priority over warehouse charges under Section 150(2)(d) in distribution of sale proceeds of warehoused goods.

14 Feb 2020

The case involves a dispute between the Union of India (appellant) and M/s. Associated Container Terminal Ltd. (respondent) regarding the priority of ...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Assessee Passed on Duty Incidence to Customers, Refund Claim Rejected. Section 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944 bars refund if duty burden shifted to others.

26 Aug 2013

The appellant, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing passenger utility vehicles and parts thereof, which are excisable under C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate of Education Cess on Exported Goods in Central Excise Matter — Education Cess Held to Be Part of Excise Duty for Rebate Purposes Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Section 37B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

29 Apr 2010

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by M/s Ispat Industries Limited challenging an order dated 30 November 2004 passed by the Deputy Commiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration Due to Non-Compliance with Section 90(2) of Finance Act, 1998. Court holds that the Designated Authority must consider the declaration on merits and cannot reject it solely on the ground that the declarant had not paid the tax determined under the Scheme within the prescribed time.

28 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Swam Mills Ltd., a composite textile mill, was served with 14 show cause notices for recovery of differential duty of approximate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal on Excise Duty Exemption for Cotton Fabrics Produced by Cooperative Society. Interpretation of Exemption Notifications under Rule 8 of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 at Issue.

27 Sep 1968

The appellant, a textile dealer in Bombay, entered into an agreement with a registered cooperative society for weaving cotton fabrics on powerlooms ow...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)