Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"

2995 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2995 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Recovery of Security Deposit in Leave and License Agreement — Defendant's Defense Raises No Triable Issues. Court holds that under Order XXXVII CPC, a defendant must disclose a substantial defense to obtain leave to defend; mere allegations of oral agreements or set-off without evidence do not constitute a triable issue.

20 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Play Games 24X7 Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Loran L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.

14 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Asset Managers in Commercial Paper Recovery Suit Despite Pending SICA Appeal. The court held that Section 22 of SICA does not bar recovery suits where BIFR has declined registration, and the defendant failed to raise any triable issue.

5 Feb 2016

The plaintiffs, Pramerica Asset Managers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed two summary suits against Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. for recovery of Rs. 25 c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Application to Vacate Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit. Allegations of Suppression of Material Facts Including Limitation of Registration in Class 25 and Prior User Evidence Are Examined.

15 Oct 2025

The dispute arose from a Commercial Suit for trade mark infringement and passing off filed by Shoban Salim Thakur, sole proprietor of M/s. Family Foot...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Plaintiff's 11-Month Delay and Lack of Genuine Urgency Leads to Relegation to Mediation.

6 Sep 2024

The plaintiff, Ultra Media and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit alleging copyright infringement of the character 'Shaktimaan' by the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Section 51 Notice in MRTP Act Case — Development Rights Not Extinguished by Lapse of Permission. Held that a notice under Section 51 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 cannot be issued for alleged breach of conditions when the development permission had already lapsed and the petitioner had acquired vested rights under a development agreement.

6 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Galore Developers Private Limited, entered into an agreement on 23 March 2010 with the Solapur Municipal Corporation (respondent nos.1...

High Court

Madras High Court Rehears Interlocutory Applications in Trademark Dispute for Interim Injunction. Court Directed to Apply Trinity Tests and Consider Section 12-A Compliance and Order 2 Rule 2 Bar After Remand by Division Bench.

5 Feb 2025

The Madras High Court reheard two interlocutory applications in a commercial suit involving a trademark dispute over the 'Massey Ferguson' brand. Trac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, and no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the applications to set aside the awards.

27 Aug 2018

The case involves nine commercial appeals filed by various micro and small enterprises (appellants) against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Reference on Interpretation of Section 9A CPC (Maharashtra Amendment) — Jurisdiction Includes Limitation. The court examines whether the expression 'jurisdiction of the Court to entertain such suit' under Section 9A includes the issue of limitation, doubting the correctness of Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society v. Praveen D. Desai.

4 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered a reference made by a Division Bench doubting the correctness of the decision in Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Arbitrability of Disputes Between Developer and Non-Signatory Member of Cooperative Society Under Development Agreement. Issue Involves Permissibility of Invoking Arbitration Clause Against Dissenting Member Not Party to Agreement.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from the redevelopment of a cooperative society's building in Mumbai. The applicant, a developer, entered into a Development Agreeme...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)