Search Results for "Collusive decree"

230 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Restitution Plea in Testamentary Proceedings. Alleged Fraudulent Consent Terms Discharge Court Receiver Without Court Order; Applicants Seek Possession Restored.

The dispute arose from the estate of Shalini Devi Ghatge, who died on 12.08.1982 leaving two wills. One will dated 06.01.1982 was propounded by the ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Adverse Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant failed to prove adverse possession for over 12 years as required under Section 65 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Virupakshappa, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Revision and Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34. Jurisdiction of Civil Court is Ousted When Secured Creditor Takes Action Under SARFAESI Act for Enforcement of Security Interest.

The case involves a civil suit filed by Sagar and Saurabh Deshmukh (original plaintiffs) against their father Pramod Deshmukh, mother Vrunda Deshmukh,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Regularisation of Encroachment on Communidade Land in Public Interest Litigation. Administrative Tribunal's Order Regularising Unauthorised Construction by Minister Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Communidade Land Protection Laws.

The petitioner, an advocate and public spirited citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the order of the Administrative Tribunal (resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiffs, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...