Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

295 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 295 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Protection of Grazing Land and Water Pond for Village Cattle. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Legal Right or Public Duty, and the Dispute Appears to Be Private in Nature.

The petitioner, a farmer, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to the State authorities to permit the use of land (new Gut No.38 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Land Acquisition under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 for Non-Compliance with Prior Notice Requirement under Section 13. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice as Ex-Parte Award Passed Without Proper Service of Notices and Without Following Section 17(5).

The High Court of Bombay heard two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land and a struc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal by Purchaser of Tenanted Agricultural Land Against Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry. Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Purchaser Cannot Claim Rights Without Adjudication Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The appellant, M/s. S. Kumar Developers and Builders, purchased agricultural land that was tenanted. The appellant obtained mutation entries in the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Remands for Fresh Compensation Determination. Mere Survey Entries Do Not Establish Tenancy Under Goa Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1976.

The appellant, Shri Ratnakar Rama Parab, owned land admeasuring 1192 sq. mtrs. in Orgao, Ponda, Goa, which was acquired by the State for the public pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka Land Reforms Case — Testamentary Succession of Tenancy Rights Upheld. Civil Court Findings on Tenancy and Succession Are Binding on Land Tribunal Under Section 48-A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The case involves a long-standing dispute over agricultural land in Bilagi Village, Karnataka, spanning over half a century. The appellant, Kanna Timm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Revenue Minister's Order Setting Aside Restoration of Land to Tenant. Delay of 34 Years in Filing Appeal Not Sufficiently Explained, Condonation Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Debashish Devnarayan Ghosh, filed two writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revenue Minister of Maharashtra and the Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of Sub-Divisional Officer in Tenancy Appeal. Government Circular Empowering Prant Officer to Exercise Collector's Powers Under Section 74 of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agriculture Lands Act, 1948 Upheld.

The petitioners, Rajendra Shivkumar Pawar and others, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th August 2022 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Order for Enquiry Under Section 59(b) of MLRC. Sale of Watan Land After Re-grant on Old Tenure Requires Enquiry Regarding Permission Under Circular Dated 13 November 1979.

The case involves a challenge by the petitioners, Vishwanath Sahadu Wakhare and others, against an order dated 11 December 2020 passed by the Hon'ble ...