Search Results for "legal proposition"

5466 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5466 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Bribery Case After Exoneration in Departmental Enquiry. Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as Identical Charges Could Not Be Established in Prior Enquiry and Tribunal Found No Evidence of Demand/Acceptance of Bribe.

The petitioner, a public servant working as a Tahasildar, was implicated in a bribery case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. A complaint w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Money Recovery Decree, Upholds Use of Photocopy Agreement as Secondary Evidence. Where Defendant Took Original Agreement to Procure Signatures and Did Not Return It, Photocopy Held Admissible Under Section 65, Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from a suit for recovery of money decreed by the trial court. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants, representing themselves as o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines Liability for Removal of Sunken Barge Wreck Under Section 14 of Indian Ports Act, 1908. Supreme Court Had Earlier Remanded the Matter for Deciding Pure Question of Law Regarding Whom Liability Falls Upon for Clearing the Wreckage.

The case involved a writ petition filed by JSW Steel Limited (formerly ISPAT Industries Limited) challenging the suspension of its permission to use M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Repugnancy Between Section 28A of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 and Section 299 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Petitioner Contends That District Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Hear Appeal from Probate Revocation.

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the constitutional validity of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...