Search Results for "wrong rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "wrong rule"

5218 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5218 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Proceedings. The Court upheld the validity of the NIA's takeover of investigation and the sanction order under Section 45(2) UAPA, finding that the timeline for independent review is directory and the cognizance order was based on prima facie material.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

High Court

Judicial Scrutiny of RBI's Supersession of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank's Board. Balance between Constitutional mandates and banking regulations reaffirmed.

18 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court assessed the legality of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in MRTP Act Compensation Dispute, Upholding NCLAT's Interest Award. Developer Found Guilty of Unfair Trade Practice for Delayed Construction and Cancellation, Entitling Complainant to Compound Interest Under Section 12B of Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.

31 Jan 2023

The dispute originated from a 1989 flat allotment in Ghaziabad where the original applicant died and was succeeded by her daughter-in-law, who continu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Disciplinary Proceedings for Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Rules. The Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside punishment due to non-compliance with U.P. Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, including failure to examine witnesses, supply documents, and seek extension of court-stipulated time.

23 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a challenge by the State of Uttar Pradesh against a High Court order dismissing its writ petition, which had sought to overturn ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

14 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Issuance of Witness Summons Under Order XVI Rule 1(3) CPC. Procedural Non-Compliance Does Not Bar Court's Discretion to Summon Witnesses in the Interest of Justice.

25 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Dinesh Singh Bhim Singh, the defendant in a civil suit, challenged an order dated 26 August 2022 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Divi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order in Service Matter — Appointment on Reserved Post Not Invalidated by Subsequent Caste Certificate Invalidity. The court held that cancellation of caste certificate after appointment does not automatically invalidate the appointment if the appointment was made after due verification and no fraud was alleged.

6 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Shri Sadanand Raghunath Gharat, was appointed as Inspector of Central Excise on 3rd December 1977 by the office of the Collector of Ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Electricity Bill Dispute — Sets Aside Lower Appellate Court's Judgment for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. First appellate court must independently assess evidence and give reasons for reversal of trial court's findings.

26 Feb 2014

The appellant, Sureshkumar S/o Rochiram Jagyasi, was a customer of the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (respondent) and operat...

High Court

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

21 Jan 2026

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Executability of Compromise Decree in Eviction Suit under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court considers whether a compromise that does not refer to specific eviction grounds creates a fresh tenancy requiring new proceedings.

27 Jul 2022

The respondent-landlord filed a suit against the petitioner-tenants seeking eviction under Section 16(1)(e)(ii) and (g) of the Maharashtra Rent Contro...

145 146 147 148 149

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)