Search Results for "tribunal’s findings"

4957 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4957 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deemed Passenger for Hire, Not Gratuitous Passenger. Negligence of Tempo Driver Proved; Insurance Company Held Liable to Indemnify Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 30.07.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Panchmahals at Godhra, in M....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below concurrently found plaintiff not to be the legally wedded wife of deceased.

The case involves a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2004 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Exemption Under Section 4(3)(vii) of Income-tax Act, 1922. Receipt Held to be Business Income, Not Exempt as Casual or Non-Recurring Receipt, as it Arose from Services Rendered in the Course of Business.

The assessee firm, Ram Kumar Agarwalla and Brothers, carried on business as share brokers and paper merchants. Together with D, a chartered accountant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses DISCOM's Appeal in Solar PPA Force Majeure Dispute — Restrictive Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 Affirmed. Government Delays in Approvals Constitute Force Majeure; No Tariff Reduction or Liquidated Damages When Developer Not at Fault.

The Supreme Court of India dismissed appeals by Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Section 34 Challenge to NSE Arbitral Awards on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds Three-Month Time Limit Under NSE Bye-laws Rule 13(b) is Directory and First Hearing Date Under Rule 13(d) is Date of Actual Hearing, Not Scheduled Hearing.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by an investor challenging an appel...