Search Results for "revenue officer"

6314 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6314 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION Nos. 452

Multiple writ petitions and a criminal application were filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging police actions of raiding or sto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in HUF Partition Suit — Suit Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose on Alienation by Coparcener.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by Defendant No.6, a third-party purchaser, challenging the rejection of his application under Order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case Due to Incorrect Adoption of Highest Price. Valuation Must Be Based on Most Conservative Price Under Rule 6(b)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 1994, as Per Precedents on Normal Wholesale Cash Price.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal filed by the revenue against an order of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition and Income Tax Appeal for Non-Prosecution Due to Repeated Absence. Petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearings, leading to dismissal for default under Order 17 Rule 2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC.

The petitioner, Vaibhav Maruti Dombale, filed a Writ Petition (No. 1489 of 2025) and an Income Tax Appeal (No. 21746 of 2025) before the Bombay High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...