Search Results for "penal consequences"

2288 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2288 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Pontiff's Appeal Against FIR Quashing in Criminal Defamation Case — Allegations of Sexual Assault and Criminal Intimidation by a Seer Against a Woman and Her Family Not Quashed at Threshold.

The appellant, a 39-year-old pontiff of Shree Samsthana Gokarna – Shree Ramachandrapura Mutta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Article 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Bank Fraud Case Due to Cooperation and No Custodial Interrogation Required. Petitioners Allegedly Induced Bank to Sanction Loans Based on Forged Documents, but Court Found No Need for Custody as Documents Already Seized and Petitioners Cooperated.

The petitioners, Rudhir Sareen, Saurav Vinay Jain, and Kamlesh Hari Kochra, filed separate writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unproven Age of Victim. Consensual Relationship Not Rape Under Sections 366 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, B. Suresh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Raichur, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition for Quashing of Criminal Case Involving IPC Sections 325, 427, 504, 506. Allegations Concern Voluntarily Causing Hurt, Mischief, Intentional Insult, and Criminal Intimidation.

This matter concerns a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay by three petitioners, namely...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Criminal Trespass Case, Holding Possession of Vacant Land and Intention to Annoy Are Sufficient. Supreme Court Rules that Complainant’s Physical Presence at Time of Trespass is Not Required Under Sections 441/447 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

This appeal by special leave arose from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Criminal Revision No. 188 of 1966, which had acquitted the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Under Section 304 Part II IPC for Exceeding Right of Self-Defence. Court Rules That Portion of Accused's Non-Confessional Statement Under Section 342 CrPC Can Be Relied Upon With Other Evidence, Distinguishing Narain Singh.

The appellant, Sampat Singh, was tried for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code but was convicted under Section 304 Part II. The trial co...