Search Results for "employee"

7259 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7259 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Transfer to Aided Posts on 100% Grant-in-Aid Basis — Prior Service on Unaided Division Counts for Regular Pay Scale. Teachers Transferred Within Same School Entitled to Full Grant-in-Aid, Not Shikshan Sevak Status.

The petitioners, five teachers, were initially appointed as Assistant Teachers on the unaided division of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 schools on 01.02.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Service Termination Case — Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld. College Tribunal's order setting aside termination of lecturer for lack of approval from University and Education Officer was valid under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The appellant, Mahadeorao Ramchandra Khadatkar, was appointed as a lecturer in economics at Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Arts and Commerce (Evening) College...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Discharge of District Judge in NSEL Scam Case — Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of MJS Rules Violates Articles 14 and 311(2) as It Imposes Penalty Without Inquiry. The court held that discharge of a probationer without inquiry is punitive and unconstitutional.

The petitioner, Ajay Ramesh Dinode, was appointed as a District Judge by nomination in August 2014 and posted as Additional District and Sessions Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSRTC Petition in Guarantor Recovery Dispute — Industrial Court Order Set Aside for Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. Co-guarantor cannot claim protection under MRTU & PULP Act against employer of principal debtor as recovery action is not an unfair labour practice.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and order dated 05.10.2016 of the Industrial Court, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for Computation of Minimum Wages. Labour Court erred in dismissing claim for difference in wages on ground of limitation and lack of adjudication of entitlement.

The petitioner, Shri Tularam Manikrao Hadge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 29.07.2019 passed by the Labour Court, Nag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Discharge of Probationary Police Constable for Unsatisfactory Service During Probation Period. Termination under Rule 6(2) of Karnataka Civil Services (Probation) Rules, 1977 is valid when based on overall performance assessment and not punitive.

The petitioner, Sri. Sayad Imamsab Chimamad, was appointed as a Reserve Police Constable and was on probation. During his probation period, his servic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Premature Retirement of Pre-Nationalization Employee. Age of Superannuation of 60 Years Protected Under Section 14 of Textile Undertakings (Nationalization) Act, 1995.

The petitioner, Wasant Sheshrao Kale, was a pre-nationalization employee of Model Mills, Nagpur, having joined as a Paid Learner Clerk on 29.5.1962 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee to Withdraw Voluntary Retirement Application Before Acceptance — Right to Withdraw Subsists Until Communication of Acceptance. Employee's Application for Voluntary Retirement Can Be Withdrawn Before Bank Communicates Acceptance, as Per Settled Law.

The petitioner, Madhusudan Govindrao Trivedi, was employed as an Assistant Cashier with UCO Bank. He applied for voluntary retirement under a scheme d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Watchman for Theft of Oil Tin. Departmental Inquiry Upheld Despite Criminal Acquittal as Standard of Proof Differs.

The petitioner, Mr. A. S. Manjrekar, was employed as a watchman with the Bombay Port Trust (BPT) since 14.10.1982. On 06.07.1998 (likely a typo for 19...