Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

3891 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3891 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Judgment on Cross Appeals in Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Dispute. Court Considers Market Value Determination and Development Charges Deduction for Acquired Land.

The case involved cross appeals arising from a land acquisition compensation dispute under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The landowner, Nalini, owne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Revision Against MACT Award for Lack of Permission Under Section 170 of Motor Vehicles Act. Insurance Company Cannot Challenge Award on Merits Without Tribunal's Permission When Owner and Driver Are Exparte.

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Court in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The petition challenged the order directing reinstatement and backwages on grounds of lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice.

The writ petition challenged the order dated 28/02/2025 passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Jalna in Complaint ULP No. 225/2019. The Indust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Minor Injured in Road Accident — Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Insurer Held Liable to Pay and Recover from Owner Due to Driver Without Valid License.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 27.11.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hiriyur, in MVC No.78/2009. The claimant, D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can Maintain Consumer Complaint as Co-Complainant.

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by the insurer (United India Insurance Company Ltd.) and the car owner (Respondent No. 2) against the...