Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7334 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7334 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Municipal Employee Before Age 58 — Violation of Service Regulations. Compulsory retirement at age 55 without following Regulation 25(3) of BMC Service Regulations, 1989 set aside as arbitrary and illegal.

The Petitioner, Smt. Yashoda Bapu Jadhav, was an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC). She was compulsorily retired at the ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Restores Conviction for Dishonour of Cheque. Complainant's Financial Capacity to Advance Loan and Legally Enforceable Debt Established, Reversing Acquittal by Sessions Court.

The appellant, Krishna Gopal Khetan, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation to Widow and Children for Death of Patient in Mental Hospital Due to Negligence. State Held Vicariously Liable for Failure to Provide Adequate Staff and Security at Yerwada Mental Hospital.

The petitioners, the widow and two children of a deceased man, filed a writ petition seeking compensation from the State of Maharashtra and its office...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Proves Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Dated 24.05.2002 for Rs.5,50,000 with Rs.5,00,000 Advance — Defendants Failed to Execute Sale Deed Despite Notice.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 24.05.2002, wherein the defendants agreed to sell suit propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRDC's Petition Challenging Withdrawal from Land Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Subsequent Purchaser Allowed to Seek Return of Land as Acquisition Was Not Completed Within Stipulated Time.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MSRDC), challenged the judgment and order dated 6th December 2005 passed by the L...