Search Results for "application returned"

4705 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4705 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition to Cancel Bail in POCSO Case — No Supervening Circumstances or Misuse of Bail Established. Cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. requires supervening circumstances or misuse of liberty, not mere disagreement with the bail order.

The State of Karnataka, represented by the Arkalgud Police, filed a petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Small Causes Court Jurisdiction in Eviction Suit Where Tenant Denies Landlord-Tenant Relationship. Denial of Jural Relationship Ousts Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Under Section 8(1) of Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Sri Pankaj L Kothari, was the sole defendant in a small causes case (S.C.1845/12) filed by the respondent, Sri T.K. Nagaraj, seeking e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Writ Petition for Citizenship Under Article 8 and Section 5(1)(b) of Citizenship Act, 1955 — Person of Indian Origin Born Abroad Entitled to Citizenship Despite Parents' Foreign Citizenship.

The case concerns the grant of Indian citizenship to Pranav Srinivasan, who was born in Singapore on 1 March 1999 to parents who had adopted Singapore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Depositor's Appeal in MPID Act Case, Directs Release of Attached Property on Bank Guarantee. Court holds that Section 4 of MPID Act does not require deposit of entire amount claimed by depositor for release of property.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 451 of 2020 filed by Rabibai Mohamad Ismail (appellant) and Criminal Appeal No. 88 of 2021 filed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Rebate Claim as Time-Barred Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act — Export Date Determines Limitation Period, Filing of ARE-1 Not a Substitute for Rebate Claim.

The petitioner, Everest Flavours Ltd., exported a consignment of 360 drums containing Menthol Crystals to Bangkok on 12 February 2006. The shipping bi...