Search Results for "registration rules"

4410 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4410 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Illegal Seizure of Vehicles Without Due Process. Authorities directed to release dumpers/tippers seized without following procedure under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioners, a partnership firm engaged in construction business and its partners, owned two dumpers/tippers (registration Nos. MH-04-CP-0308 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Mayor's Approval for Leader of Opposition in Municipal Corporation. The court held that the leader of opposition is elected by the opposition group and the Mayor's approval is not required under Section 31A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions concerning the appointment of the leader of opposition in the Nanded-Waghala Municipal Corporation. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Detention Orders for Lack of Proper Adjudication. Detention orders under Section 129 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 quashed for violating natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was given and orders were unreasoned.

The petitioner, Bharat Co Operative Bank Mumbai Ltd, filed two writ petitions challenging detention orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State ...