Search Results for "police influence"

1640 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1640 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Under Section 302 IPC — Conviction Based on Testimony of Eye-Witnesses and Medical Evidence

The appellant, Deepak Ramchandra Chavan, was convicted by the 5th AdHoc Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.796 of 2008 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping of Minor Girl. Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 5(1) and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC.

The appellant, Rupesh Parasram Nehare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Warora in Special (POCSO) Case No. 05 of 2015 for offences under Section 5(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010822332025_1

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in 498A IPC Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction Under Section 498A IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration Not Corroborated and Mother's Testimony Contradicted.

The appeal arose against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, in Sessions Case 12 of 1999, convicting the accused under Section 498A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Notification Declaring PFI Unlawful with Immediate Effect under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Court Holds That Reasons for Immediate Effect are Sufficiently Disclosed in Notification Itself as Required by Section 3(3) Proviso.

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Popular Front of India (PFI), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Suspension Orders of Extension Officer and Block Education Officer Were Vitiated by Non-Application of Mind and Ministerial Interference. Dispute Centered on Allegations That Employees Were Suspended for Having Exposed Fraud in a Government-Aided School.

The matter arose from two writ petitions filed by employees of the Zilla Parishad, Nanded, challenging their suspension orders dated 30.11.2015. Petit...