Search Results for "online submission"

4126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition for Survey and Demarcation of Property — Petitioner's Application for Survey and Patta Considered. Court Directs Respondents to Complete Survey Within Four Weeks and Provide Police Protection if Necessary.

The petitioner, Dayana, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents, par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Due to Discrepancies in Evidence. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Execution of Agreement and Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Jaspal Singh, entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 22.06.2003 with the respondent, Ashwani Kumar, for purchase of 12 marlas of land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Setting Aside of Compromise Decree in Partition Suit Due to Fraud and Forged Signatures. Compromise Decree Based on Forged Signatures of Defendant No.5 is a Nullity and Can Be Challenged Beyond Limitation Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.

The case arises from a partition suit filed by Dinbandhu Ojha (original plaintiff) seeking 1/4th share in the property of common ancestor Thakur Ojha....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against High Court Order Setting Aside Rejection of Discharge in Gang Rape Case. High Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence at Pre-Charge Stage Under Section 227 CrPC.

The present appeals were preferred by the State of West Bengal against the impugned judgment and order dated 06.05.2022 passed by the High Court at Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Director Convicted for Electricity Theft — Acquittal Restored Due to Lack of Evidence of Personal Involvement. Vicarious liability under Sections 39 and 44 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 cannot be imposed without proof of direct participation or knowledge of tampering.

The appellant, Mahaveer, was a director of M/s Rushi Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd., a company in Jalana, Maharashtra. The Maharashtra State Electricity ...