Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition for Survey and Demarcation of Property — Petitioner's Application for Survey and Patta Considered. Court Directs Respondents to Complete Survey Within Four Weeks and Provide Police Protection if Necessary.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 115
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dayana, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents, particularly the Tahsildar and Surveyor (respondents 3 and 4), to survey and demarcate her property comprised in S.No.751/1, to an extent of 50 cents, patta No.1131, situated at Kaliyal Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District, and to issue a separate patta in her name. She also sought police protection from respondents 2 and 5. The property originally belonged to the petitioner's mother, who executed a settlement deed on 3.5.2021 in favor of the petitioner. Due to disturbances from respondents 5 to 7 (private parties), the petitioner approached the authorities and paid necessary fees for survey and demarcation, but received no response. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the survey was scheduled to be held on the date of hearing. The court, after hearing both sides, directed the third and fourth respondents to consider the petitioner's online application dated 8.2.2023 and complete the survey and demarcation within four weeks. The court also directed the second and fifth respondents to provide police protection for the survey if required. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Survey and Demarcation - Writ of Mandamus - Petitioner sought direction to survey and demarcate property and issue patta - Court directed respondents to consider petitioner's application and complete survey within four weeks - Held that the respondents must act on the application and provide police protection if necessary (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to survey and demarcate the petitioner's property and issue a separate patta based on the petitioner's application.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the third and fourth respondents to consider the petitioner's online application dated 8.2.2023 and complete the survey and demarcation within four weeks. The second and fifth respondents were directed to provide police protection for the survey if required. The writ petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Survey and Demarcation
  • Patta Issuance
  • Police Protection
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 443

W.P(MD)NO.12753 OF 2023

2025-01-27

N.MALA

2025:MHC:301

Mr.A.Rajaram, Mr.A.Kannan, Mr.K.Gnanasekaran, Mr.B.Brijesh Kishore

Dayana

1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, 2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, 3.The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, 4.The Surveyor, Vilavancode Taluk, 5.The Inspector of Police, Kadayalmoodu Police Station, 6.Venuslass, 7.Paulraj, 8.John, 9.Rani, 10.Renso, 11.Selastin, 12.Victoria, 13.Prajin, 14.Bibin

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition seeking Mandamus for survey and demarcation of property and issuance of patta.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents 3 and 4 to survey and demarcate petitioner's property and issue separate patta, and to respondents 2 and 5 to provide police protection.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's application for survey and demarcation was not responded to by the authorities.

Issues

Whether the respondents are obligated to survey and demarcate the petitioner's property and issue a patta based on the application.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the property was settled to the petitioner and due to disturbances, survey and demarcation were needed. Additional Government Pleader submitted that survey was scheduled to be held on the date of hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the respondents must consider the petitioner's application for survey and demarcation and complete the process within a reasonable time, with police protection if necessary.

Judgment Excerpts

The Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4 to survey and demarcate the Petitioner’s property... The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1,3 and 4 submitted that the survey is scheduled to be held today.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed an online application on 8.2.2023 for survey and demarcation. No response was received, leading to the filing of the writ petition on an unspecified date. The court heard the matter on 27.01.2025 and disposed of it with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Perpetual Injunction Dispute — No Substantial Question of Law Found. The court upheld the first appellate court's concurrent findings on possession and absence of right of way under Section 100 of the Co...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Employer in Industrial Disputes Act Case; Holds Temporary Employee's Discharge Simpliciter and Bonafide. Termination Was Not Punitive or Malafide and Section 11-A Not Applicable to Pending Reference as It Had Prospective Effect.