Search Results for "additional fee"

2008 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2008 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Teachers for Release of Withheld Salary — Non-Payment of Salary Without Justification Violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Court Directs Respondents to Release Salary Within Six Weeks.

The petitioners, four teachers employed at Shri. Deshbhushan High School, Kothali Kuppanwadi, Chikkodi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Family Court Order Denying Interim Maintenance to Wife and Children in Domestic Violence Case — Held That Maintenance Cannot Be Denied on Ground of Wife's Earning Capacity Without Assessing Actual Income and Needs of Children.

The petitioners, Smt. Shylaja S.R. (wife) and her two minor sons, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes GST Appellate Order Against Indian Oil Corporation for Violation of Natural Justice — Pre-deposit Requirement Set Aside. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Renders Appellate Order Unsustainable Under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in storage and supply of petroleum products, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Delay in Deposit of Balance Sale Consideration Condoned. The court held that the conditional decree was satisfied by deposit under court orders, and the judgment-debtor's right to rescind was lost as he did not seek rescission before deposit.

The appellant, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of 3.75 acres of land dated 14.11.2011, wherein the respondent, agreed t...