Search Results for "prohibition officer"

2453 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2453 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction Under PP Act Against SARFAESI Possession. Asset Reconstruction Company Asserts SARFAESI Act Overrides PP Act, Requiring Landlord to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.

The writ petitioner, an Asset Reconstruction Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered under the SARFAESI Act, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Alleging Police Bias. Court finds no exceptional circumstances warranting transfer, holds that investigation is progressing and petitioner's grievances can be addressed by trial court.

The petitioner, Shahrukh Ziya Mohammad, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Wakf Board Notification Including Service Inam Lands in Dargah Property. Errata Notification Adding Lands to Wakf Property Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Wakf Act, 1995.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that upheld an Errata Notification issued b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Transfer to Aided Posts on 100% Grant-in-Aid Basis — Prior Service on Unaided Division Counts for Regular Pay Scale. Teachers Transferred Within Same School Entitled to Full Grant-in-Aid, Not Shikshan Sevak Status.

The petitioners, five teachers, were initially appointed as Assistant Teachers on the unaided division of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 schools on 01.02.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Order Allowing Additional Statements at Pre-Charge Stage. Production of Additional Statements Under Section 173(8) CrPC Without Notice to Accused and Without Opportunity to Cross-Examine Violates Fair Trial Rights.

The petitioners, original accused in Sessions Case No.644 of 1996, challenged an order dated 16th October 2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge...