Search Results for "additional fee"

1998 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1998 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Trial Court's Discretion Not Found Arbitrary or Perverse in Restraining Use of Deceptively Similar Mark 'Shriphal'.

The appeal arises from an order of the trial court granting a temporary injunction in favor of the respondent/plaintiff, M/s Mysore Deep Perfumery Hou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.

The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order in Suit for Specific Performance — Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Interim Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Smt. Venkamma Namasivayam, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Dismissed as No Substantial Question of Law Arises.

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiffs, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Suit for Specific Performance Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Refusal to Execute Sale Deed in 2018.

The appellants, Sri K.T. Govinde Gowda and Smt. G. Anuradha, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order Setting Aside Dismissal of Suit Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC — Order IX Rule 5 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory, and Dismissal of Suit for Non-Service of Summons Within One Year Not Automatic Where Suit Has Progressed to Evidence Stage

The case involves a writ petition filed by Smt. Zaibunnisa and Mr. Riyazur Rahim, sister and brother, against an order passed by the 6th Additional Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Bank Guarantees in Tender Dispute. Earnest Money Deposit Forfeited as Bidder's Unilateral Discount Offer After Bid Opening Violated Tender Terms.

The petitioner, Knowledge Infrastructure Systems Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in coal trading, along with its shareholder, filed a writ petition under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...