Search Results for "IPC 506"

1979 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1979 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Shack Licence for Filing False Affidavit Regarding Criminal Cases. Suppression of Pending Charge Sheets and False Statements in Affidavit Violate Clause 25 of Tourism Policy 2016-2019.

The petitioner, Dhaktu Naik, challenged the order dated 12/6/2019 of the Director of Tourism, Goa, cancelling his shack licence for filing false affid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Family Dispute Case. Accused convicted under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 of IPC for stabbing mother-in-law, wife, and sister-in-law after demand for wife's return to marital home.

The appellant, Isak Abdul Haq Patel, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Sessions Case No. 223 of 1992 for the murder of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Moharam Riot Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Unlawful Assembly and Common Object. Evidence of Witnesses Found Unreliable and Contradictory, Leading to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 324, 323, 504, 506 of IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment dated 31-10-1995 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi in Sessions Case No. 26 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 364, 342, 386, 506(2) IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Amitabh @ Amit @ Rana Sameer Roy, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay in Sessions Case No. 893 of 1994 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty to Pregnant Wife — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 498-A, and 316 IPC.

The appellant, Laxman s/o Vasanta Dhotre alias Hanmantu Mhaisappa Kalkutkar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded in Sessions Case No.81 of 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Rape and Intimidation Case Due to Amicable Settlement Between Parties. Court Permits Quashing of Non-Compoundable Offences Under Section 482 CrPC Where Settlement is Genuine and Chances of Conviction are Remote.

The applicant, Amit Kumar Singh, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Alleged Assault with Deadly Weapons Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Turn Hostile and Medical Evidence Does Not Corroborate Ocular Testimony.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment dated 29.12.2006 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, acquitting the respondents (original...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against In-Laws in Dowry Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. General and Omnibus Allegations Against All Family Members Without Particulars of Overt Acts Are Insufficient to Sustain Charges Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The judgment arises from three criminal writ petitions filed by the in-laws of the complainant, Priya Waghmare, challenging the common order passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Acquits Appellants Under SC/ST Act. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 504, 506(2) IPC and Sections 3(1)(x), 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act set aside for lack of credible testimony.

The present criminal appeal was filed by the appellants, originally accused in Atrocity Sessions Case No.37 of 2001, challenging their conviction by t...