Search Results for "Explanation sale"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Explanation sale"

3269 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3269 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Government's Appeal Against Arbitrator's Award in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under National Highways Act, 1956. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Market Value Determination Based on Sale Instances and Commercial Potential, But Sets Aside Additional Relief Granted by Principal District Judge as Beyond Section 34 Jurisdiction.

12 Aug 2022

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition dispute under the National Highways Act, 1956. The Government of India (GOI) and N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Reassessment Notice Issued Within Four Years Held Invalid Due to Full Disclosure. Tribunal's Finding of Full and True Disclosure by Assessee During Original Assessment Proceedings Upheld Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

8 Aug 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-3 (revenue) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 22/9/2009 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Mehr (Dower) Payment in Family Court Appeal - Sets Aside Dismissal of Petition for Recovery of Rs. 50 Lakhs Mehr Agreed in Nikahnama. The court held that the Family Court erred in dismissing the petition ex parte without considering the wife's entitlement to Mehr under Muslim Personal Law.

5 Dec 2019

The appellant, Saida Parveen, married the respondent, Rizwan Ahmad Abbas, on 16 January 2016, while his first marriage to Shagufta Parveen was still s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

24 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part on Replacement of Machinery and Depreciation Issues Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure on Replacement of Entire Machinery is Capital Expenditure; IFCI Adjustment Not Actual Payment Under Section 43AB; Full Depreciation on Dumpers Requires Evidence of Use.

22 Jan 2025

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, dated 26.12...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Criminal Conspiracy. Conviction under Sections 256, 259 read with 120B IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove meeting of minds or knowledge of counterfeit nature.

31 Jul 2017

The appellant, A. Nizamuddin, was convicted by the Special Judge, Bengaluru, under Sections 256 (possession of counterfeit currency), 259 (delivery of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Delhi High Court’s Unconditional Stay of Money Decree Under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC. Execution of Trademark Infringement Money Decree Stayed Without Deposit Pending Appeal, Upheld by Apex Court Citing Sufficient Cause.

24 Sep 2025

The dispute arose from a civil suit instituted by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and anor, claiming to be the proprietor of the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.

2 Aug 2017

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for tra...

High Court

High Court of Madras Quashes Ex-Parte Compromise Decree? – Revision Petitions Challenge Validity Under Order XXIII CPC. Alleged settlement decree in property suits passed without hearing all parties violated procedural safeguards of Order XXIII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

13 Mar 2026

The two Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India were filed against the common judgment and decree dated 11.12.2024 in ...

138 139 140 141 142

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)