Search Results for "vehicle manufacturing"

191 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 191 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) Dismisses Defendant's Second Appeal in Promissory Note Recovery Suit — Execution Admitted, Presumption Not Rebutted. Presumption under Section 118 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; rejection of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC upheld.

The dispute arose from a suit for recovery of money based on a promissory note dated 25.06.2007 executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION Nos. 452

Multiple writ petitions and a criminal application were filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging police actions of raiding or sto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...