Search Results for "tank land"

526 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 526 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC in Land Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of fact regarding ownership and encroachment cannot be decided in summary rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants, who were original opponent Nos. 2 and 3, against the judgment and order dated 12.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

2162

The appeal concerned the excise classification of a gas mixture generated during sugar manufacturing. The appellants, sugar companies, used a carbonat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Issued by Panchayat President Under Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 — Lack of Jurisdiction. Panchayat President Not Competent Authority Under Section 6 of Tanks Act; Notice Set Aside.

The petitioner, S. Vajravelu, filed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice dated 18.08.2022 issued by the President of Nedunkundram Panchayat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose. Acquisition of Petitioners' Land for Archaeological Museum Set Aside as Notification Did Not Specify Public Purpose Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Nidasheshi Veeranna and Gali Prakash, along with Gali Shivabasappa in the connected petition, owned agricultural lands in Sy.No.4/1 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapse. Petitioners contend that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Sections 24, 25 of the 2013 Act due to non-making of award within prescribed period.

These writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings. The petitioners, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against BDA and State — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for Declaration and Possession Dismissed as Plaintiffs Could Not Establish Ownership Over Property Allegedly Acquired by BDA.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 09.03.2007 passed by the IX Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S.No.9426/1997, dismissing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...